News Center Understand customer needs and strive for excellence in quality, delivery, service, and environmental responsibility
AMELH6020S-1R5MT: Latest Performance & Specs Summary
Date: 2026-01-20 12:35:10 Source: Browse: 0

Latest datasheet metrics and bench tests show this compact power component targets high-current DC–DC designs with a favorable balance of inductance, DCR and thermal performance. This piece gives a concise, data-led snapshot so engineers can quickly screen, test and decide whether the part fits point-of-load and synchronous-buck applications.

Purpose: provide an actionable summary of key AMELH6020S-1R5MT specs, real-world performance indicators, recommended evaluation steps, simulation and layout guidance, plus procurement and sign-off checkpoints engineers can copy into lab notes and qualification reports.

Quick product overview and fit-for-purpose

AMELH6020S-1R5MT: Latest Performance & Specs Summary

AMELH6020S-1R5MT appears as a surface-mount power inductor in a compact package optimized for high-ripple, high-current buck regulators. The part name implies a nominal inductance of 1.5 μH; the value trades off compact footprint and low DCR against DC-bias behavior to support 10–30 A class converters depending on thermal conditions.

What the AMELH6020S-1R5MT is (one-paragraph snapshot)

Point: a hot-pressed, flat-wire molded surface-mount power inductor designed for high-current DC–DC converters. Evidence: the datasheet indicates 1.5 μH nominal, low-profile form and construction optimized for low DCR. Explanation: this combination yields efficient energy storage for switching nodes while limiting losses, making it suitable where board area and thermal routing are constrained.

Key checklist for designers (quick bullets)

  • Inductance under DC-bias — L vs I curve at converter bias point
  • Saturation current and how Isat is defined on the datasheet
  • DC resistance (DCR) at ambient and its temperature coefficient
  • Rated current (Irms) vs thermal rise limits
  • SRF and frequency-dependent impedance for switching harmonics
  • Package footprint/height and board-stacking constraints
  • Environmental ratings: RoHS and MSL level

Electrical & mechanical specs — quick reference table

Report a compact set of fields so comparisons are apples-to-apples. Include nominal values, test conditions and clear units to avoid misinterpretation when moving from datasheet to lab data.

Essential electrical specs to report

Point: provide a single-row-per-parameter table capturing conditions. Evidence: typical expected ranges guide screening—1.5 μH nominal, tolerance ±20%, DCR in single-digit milliohms, rated currents in double-digit amps. Explanation: these fields let thermal and loss budgets be calculated immediately for a candidate design.

Parameter Value / Note
Nominal inductance 1.5 μH @ specified test frequency
Tolerance ±10–20% typical
Test frequency 100 kHz (or as datasheet)
Rated current (Irms / Isat) Manufacturer-defined; report both Irms and Isat
DC Resistance (DCR) e.g., 2–10 mΩ range — specify measurement temp
SRF Report if provided; otherwise measure
Ripple capability Specify tested ΔI and waveform

Mechanical & environmental specs to report

Point: include board-level constraints. Evidence: report L×W×H, recommended land pattern, weight, solder profile and MSL. Explanation: height and footprint drive placement near connectors or under shields; include landing pattern to avoid reflow issues and to plan thermal vias if necessary.

Performance benchmarks & test data engineers care about

Engineers need curves and pass/fail thresholds more than raw numbers. Present impedance vs frequency and L vs DC-bias curves plus DCR/thermal-rise data tied to realistic converter currents.

Frequency & DC-bias performance (impedance and L vs current)

Point: show impedance vs frequency and L vs DC-bias. Evidence: capture 100 kHz–10 MHz impedance points and L at converter DC bias points (e.g., 5 V→1 V, operating DC current). Explanation: a steep drop in L with modest DC bias indicates early saturation; acceptable behavior is a gradual decline with usable inductance at operating current.

Thermal, loss and DCR behavior under load

Point: quantify I^2·R losses and thermal rise. Evidence: measure DCR vs temperature and run thermal-rise tests at rated ripple and DC currents. Explanation: calculate copper losses (I^2·DCR) and compare thermal rise to allowed junction/board limits; use these figures to size copper pours and vias for cooling.

How to evaluate and model AMELH6020S-1R5MT for your design

Measurement and modeling complete the selection process: consistent test methods and frequency-dependent models let simulation match lab results and avoid surprise behavior in production.

Measurement checklist & lab setup

Point: a short procedural checklist prevents mis-measurement. Evidence: use an LCR meter with proper fixture, Kelvin DCR measurement for milliohm values, bias tees or DC bias supplies for L vs I. Explanation: record test frequency, ambient temperature, fixture inductance and probe method; recommended frequencies include 100 kHz and converter switching frequency harmonics.

Simulation & PCB integration tips

Point: extract R, L and frequency-dependent impedance for SPICE/EM. Evidence: include parasitic R, ESR trend and SRF in models; layout guidance: keep inductor close to switching node, provide short thermal return paths and thermal vias under the land pattern. Explanation: these steps reduce EMI, improve transient response and ensure thermal dissipation aligns with lab-tested limits.

Typical applications, comparisons and alternatives

Use-case mapping speeds selection: list typical topologies and offer succinct substitution criteria so designers know when to choose or seek alternatives.

Best-fit application cases

Point: target synchronous buck and point-of-load regulators. Evidence: compactness and low DCR make it suitable for rails such as 5 V→1 V at 10–25 A. Explanation: in tight layouts where board area and profile are limited, this part balances conduction losses and inductor volume for efficient conversion.

When to consider alternatives (selection criteria)

Point: define common trade-offs. Evidence: if DCR must be lower for higher efficiency, choose a larger or different construction; if thermal headroom is limited, consider taller or larger footprint options. Explanation: compare DCR, rated current, height and thermal spec; substitutions must be verified by the same bench tests described above.

Procurement, testing roadmap and go/no-go checklist

Practical QC and procurement rules reduce risk in production. Define minimum qualification buys, incoming test sampling and sign-off criteria before volume release.

Sourcing & QC checklist for production

Point: recommend qualification steps. Evidence: run incoming visual/dimensional inspection and electrical spot checks (DCR and inductance) on sample lots; maintain lot traceability and sample size records. Explanation: initial buys should cover engineering samples and a qualification lot to verify consistency across manufacturing batches.

Final design sign-off criteria

Point: compact sign-off template speeds decisions. Evidence: require L within spec at operating DC-bias, DCR within X% of spec, thermal rise within allowed margin at rated current, mechanical fit confirmed and supply-chain lead-time acceptable. Explanation: use pass/fail thresholds in a short checklist to finalize component approval for production.

Summary

  • AMELH6020S-1R5MT functions as a compact power inductor well suited for high-current DC–DC buck converters; confirm L at operating DC-bias and DCR for loss budgets.
  • Key electrical specs to capture: nominal inductance, DCR, Irms/Isat and impedance over 100 kHz–10 MHz; include test conditions to ensure comparable data.
  • Layout and procurement must-dos: place near switching node, provide thermal vias, perform incoming QC sampling and require thermal-rise verification before sign-off.

Frequently Asked Questions

Measure inductance vs DC-bias at the intended converter current, Kelvin DCR at ambient and elevated temperature, and capture impedance across 100 kHz–10 MHz. These three datasets let you calculate I^2·R losses, detect early saturation and size PCB cooling. Record fixture and test conditions for reproducibility.

DCR determines copper conduction loss via I^2·R. Even milliohm-level changes translate to watts at high currents; use measured DCR to compute steady-state losses, then validate thermal rise on the board. If losses push temperatures beyond spec, increase copper area or add thermal vias.

Compare nominal inductance, DCR, Irated/Isat, footprint and height. If the candidate has significantly higher DCR or lower Isat, it may reduce efficiency or saturate earlier. Always validate substitutes with the same bias and thermal tests used during qualification.

Technical guidance is general; always validate with the manufacturer's latest datasheet and your lab-specific test fixtures and conditions.